Monday, 17 April 2017

Lots of art, lots of films, an essay about online trolls and a load more…

As a precursor to this blog, I haven’t read through it, simply because it’s over 8000 words (including a 3000 word essay), so at this point it needs to be published so that I can get the past month out of the way. As another precursor,  part of this blog was written a little less than a month ago, before I came back to Suffolk for the holidays, so some things have changed whilst others have stayed the same. I thought it was kind of nice to keep this content, seeing how I’ve changed in the month since writing this shit. New content is in italics, then later on it goes back to normal text…

It is now officially Easter, I miss you Blockbuster is over, the offsite show went well and soon I’ll be heading back to Suffolk. I guess this will be a ‘round up’ blog, reflecting on the last few months alongside catching up on all the stuff that I’ve been doing this week in preparation for saying goodbye to another part of my life.

So, the SNAP exhibition on Friday went incredibly well. In preparation for this ‘evening of events’ we put together a spreadsheet with times alongside printing t-shirts with the SNAP logo to identify the artists from the audience. The spreadsheet acted as our press release, as we didn’t actually know where each of our works were going to be leading up to the evening, so no time to draw up a plan. We also set up various cameras documenting the experience, two on either side of the hall, a photographer who took photographs throughout the evening and my own artwork, Viewpoints and Data Distortion, which live streamed to my own Facebook account for the duration of the evening. Obviously the idea of the exhibition, making the whole thing into a performance within itself, deemed the cameras to be incredibly necessary.

The evening was a success, with the work looking great alongside the performances going incredibly well. My own work was received well, especially the piece Guided Representation, a set of 6 badges with different web browsers printed onto them. These were being given away for free and acted as a kind of voting system, with people picking the browsers that they commonly used. I obviously didn’t say outright that this was the case, or that one should choose your own, but I feel that this was very much assumed as you kind of ‘get’ it by walking up to the work. I enjoy how about 100 people now have an artwork of mine in their pocket/bag/house.

Here’s a link to the livestream that my phone captured, nearly three hours of content if you’re a fan of blurry videos and embarrassing moments: www.youtube.com/watch?v=wL53AFoVQc0&t=2644s

Other things that happened this week, the sweet dispenser arrived and the badges were photographed within them, seen on my website here: www.bobbicknell-knight.com/guided-representation. I called the piece Guided Representation due to the badges being a form of representation, representing ones political beliefs and in a way showing off/performing to others around them. It’s a form of ‘guided representation’ because of this performative act of wearing a badge, with a lot of thought having gone into the choice of web browser, that you yourself use and the one that others use too. If you want to look ‘cool’ you may choose the Tor browser, one well known for allowing you to enter into the ‘deep web’. If you’re of an older generation you might choose internet explorer, reflecting on the past, whereas young people will probably choose Chrome, a web browser that over 80% of the internet uses.

Another work that I basically finished was the video piece that I began working on last week, emoji scrolling alongside airport surveillance. I titled it Automated Compression, working off of the vacuum sealed bag alongside the continued automation of basic tasks, like going through airport security or making a delivery. Take a look at the finished video here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6Sv9HGqEkw

Here’s some documentation of the installation.
Another little piece I put together was a sort of reflection of my own curatorial practice, utilising some of the answers to the interviews that I’ve been conducting with artists alongside old work, like my vaporwave-y work alongside the Sims family. I took this image and have gotten it printed onto canvas, marble and all. Here’s how it looks, still unsure of what to call it. Side note here, I left this piece in Suffolk, so will probably document it in a few months if I still like it.

I’m still waiting for the bitcoin to be 3D printed. This will arrive in the next few weeks hopefully… The bitcoin arrived, it looks great and is huge! I haven’t got around to spray painting it yet. Hopefully soon, then I’ll display it on a plinth resting on a classic coin holder.

In terms of isthisit?, the exhibition with A217 is over. I’ll be de-installing that tomorrow, with the only annoying aspect of that being posting back work, which I always hate doing. All in all it went incredibly well, with a bunch of people coming to take a look at the show and giving me their email, etc, etc. I will definitely be putting on another physical show, and soon!

The magazine is fully done and currently taking pre-orders! I’ve decided to order a bunch and then deliver them myself to people, simply because the postage for one magazine from the website was so much money (I think about the same price as the actual mag) so fuck that. I am also able to sell them cheaper by ordering in bulk. I set the cost to £12.99 (including postage), alongside getting a free limited edition web browser badge, so adding my own artwork into the experience. I’m currently waiting for the text mag to arrive, then I can order a bunch, obviously sooner rather than later! I’m excited to finally get the mag out there and (hopefully) getting feedback from people. Here’s a link if you want to pre-order, it stops me from freaking out about spending a ton of my own money at once and also shows me that people want to actually read it, which is a really nice feeling within itself - www.isthisitisthisit.com/magazine

Concerning the magazine, I hosted an online launch event a few weeks ago. Lots of performances over a 2 hour period, including my own version of Watching Me, Watching You. I think the whole thing went fairly well, but it was incredibly hectic on my end, although I think that it was quite nice to watch me watching the other performances, etc. It also made it incredibly clear that maybe isthisit? needs a bigger following before doing a live online event. Offline events, people are attracted by free beer and the chat, but online you’re alone, beside a computer with no beer to hand. I wonder how to combat this… If you missed the event follow the link to see many great performances: www.isthisitisthisit.com/issue-1-launch

              The online shows are still going strong with HUTT Collective organising an exhibition of physical works alongside artwork solely made for the online space. It’s a fun show, a bunch of work being thrown onto a white we page, similar to the exhibition a while ago with Scaffold Gallery. These are solid shows, although I prefer ones where the curator has considered the layout and attempted to do something innovative with the medium of the internet. However, it is always interesting to see what the guest curators do, and there hasn’t been one yet that I’ve hated which is a surprise. Go to www.isthisitisthisit.com/limbo-lambada to see the exhibition. Next week I’m taking a slot to put on my own curated experience. I’m unsure what that will manifest itself as. It’s time to actually look at the submissions on CuratorSpace for once.

Since this show there’s been a bunch more (obviously), one curated by myself, another by East Bristol Contemporary and the most recent one from Luke Nairn. You can read all the curatorial notes, as always, by going to www.isthisitisthisit.com/curatorial-notes

Here’s mine for the show ‘url 2 irl 2 url’:
It’s common knowledge that people act differently on the internet than in the ‘real’ world, with the mask of the screen to hide behind one arguably allows their true self to appear, anonymously trolling on internet forums whilst creating countless profiles on Facebook in order to ‘cyber-bully’, an old hat phrase by todays standards… Although in the post-Trump era we are seeing a revolution, or evolution, of the cyber bully, reverting to being a physical embodiment of the bully, a frightening prospect. This week’s exhibition on isthisit?, titled ‘url 2 irl 2 url’, grouped together a number of artworks that explore the disconnect that occurs between our offline and online selves and how social media is constantly used as a space to create an alter ego of oneself. As you first encounter the exhibition you’re assaulted by the consistent sound of white noise coming from Hazel Soper’s video ‘Slag. I blame the parents.’ that utilises a variety of found texts which seem to have been taken from various online message boards. These float across the screen, eventually filling the space and effectively drowning the viewer in abusive messages, specifically levelled at women, reinforcing the offline hierarchy that’s commonly reciprocated on websites like 4chan and Reddit. On the other end of the screen there’s Stephanie Wilson’s short film ‘Volume & The Void’ which sees a flimsy cut out of a robotic hand being manoeuvred, as if stroking something, which in this case becomes the film that’s being layered behind it, a close up exploration of a human hand. This subtle experience that slowly occurs over the course of a few minutes is oddly charming, and, rather than experiencing a disconnect between the two forms, I begin to see beauty on the screen, the dancing fingers of the robotic hand being embraced by the details of the human skin. Maybe a look to the robotic relationships of the future... The final piece is a digital image from Robert Cooper titled ‘@thefutureisfamous’, which is their handle on Instagram, an ongoing art project within itself where they post photographs of themselves, usually heavily digitally altered, exploring the line between the online and the offline self that is continually questioned by users of various social media platforms. As we as a race become more immersed in creating a fictitious online portrait of ourselves, it begs the question, who is the real you? Or, more personally, which one of you is the real Bob?
I think I’m getting better about writing about my own shows that I’ve curated, as well as writing in general? In the next week I have an essay to write, left incredibly late, but why not?

This month’s resident on the website, Stacey Davidson, is making some really interesting progress. At the moment she’s putting together a variety of collages based on album covers she’d create if she had a band, alongside her continued documentation of her daily life, etc. Definitely go and check it out here - www.isthisitisthisit.com/share-it-with-the-world

This month’s resident is now Tabitha Steinberg who’s in LA, making some work about congestion, linking to Trump and the various administrations, etc.

This is where the blog written at the beginning of Easter ends, and me writing now begins, switching from italics to normal.

Me and Helena have been planning a show in Leeds at Serf which is going to happen on the 27th of this month. It’s mostly to promote the magazine some more, an afk launch event if you will, although I’ve been trying to make it into more a=of an exhibition about making money from making artwork, etc, and the various commercial avenues one can go down, mainly merchandise. I’ve put together a bunch of isthisit? merchandise, a hat, a mug, pens, t-shirt, stickers…These will be shown as works within themselves and will be sold during the private view of the show. I’m hoping the majority of this sells, simply because I can’t be fucked to bring stuff back to London on the bus. I’m also printing a bunch of pages from the magazine big, around a metre or two wide. There will be a few of these printed, alongside a huge scroll of the whole magazine, running from one wall of the space and onto the floor, where the magazines to be sold will be resting. This works as a taster for the actual magazine, as well as a work within itself. Kind of fun. Here’s a few images of how it’s looking right now, a work in progress, obviously…

What else has been going on? 30 works 30 days began with 12o collective, which has been fun for the past week and a bit. It’s a nice refresher at times, a mild annoyance at others, especially as there’s no show at the end. I guess the whole point of the experience is to refresh your practice, so it shouldn’t be about getting a show at the end, you shouldn’t need a motivator, although the group experience is a motivator within itself. Either way, it’s a great idea and an incredibly impressive project. Also, thinking about money, 160 or so people are a part of it, 3 pounds each to get in, that’s £480 to organise this shit. There should be more money involved for the organisers, what with daily online exhibitions, etc. It’s also great that they’ve got a fairly big following now, so can begin to rely on crowdfunding projects in the future from people who they’ve worked with in the past. Hopefully isthisit? will turn into something like this in the future, maybe, who knows. It’s nice thinking about how far I’ve come as an artist since this time last year, especially as 30/30 was the first thing that I ever applied for... Side note, next week I'll post all the work I've done for 30/30, but right now I'm tired and want this post to be over...

Other things, I did an interview with Tabby (the resident for this month on isthisit?) which can be read at FAD magazine here - http://fadmagazine.com/2017/04/03/tabitha-steinberg-interviews-artist-bob-bicknell-knight/

Oh shit, also, I was asked by Luke Nairn (founder of DVD IS DEAD) to create a new video series for the Instagram, which I did, and is now being shown on the Instagram over at www.instagram.com/dvdisdead/ It’s a conversation that I had between a bot on Kik, it moves from talking about baking to considering what real intelligence is, and the bot questioning whether I’m a bot or not. This is shown on Facebook messenger bubbles fading onto the screen, with the backgrounds being taken from idle moments in videogames, specifically Mass Effect 1, 2 and 3. This is a science fiction RPG, one that sees you traversing the galaxy, confronting aliens and robots. I was interested in these beautiful landscape city shots which see flying cars zooming across the screen in the background. A future, intricately rendered world, accompanied by the present aesthetic of Facebook messenger looking to the future, seemed to work quite well. I think I’m just a sucker for these beautiful landscapes. See the full video here, or just wait for Luke to publish the rest of the episodes on the Instagram: www.bobbicknell-knight.com/you-know-i-have-this-fun-test I want to think about how best to install this work, although I’m currently thinking that simply having it in a darkened room projecting onto a wall would work beautifully…

What else has happened? I’m currently being interview over WhatsApp by Jef Ko about my work and everything else I do, which is kind of fun. It’s a lot easier to drunk text than drunk email, which is my only concern, although maybe that would add an interesting dynamic to questions/answers. I also wanted to use the app, due to its privacy settings not allowing anyone and everyone to read the conversations that are taking place, as opposed to Facebook and email correspondence. This will be coming out on Jef’s platform, KoProjects - www.koprojects.com/

I also got into a few things, an exhibition occurring within a public toilet called '100 years of OUI', which I’ll hear about soon! Then a solo online show at Feign Cubed, a fun virtual gallery space that (I think) has been put together by Manchester School of Art students. My show is on right now, and it’s kind of fun to see what they’ve done with my work. Go here to see it until Friday (the 21st) - feigncubed.com/

I also sold a work at the 'Glitch Art is Dead' show at Gamut Gallery in Minneapolis, which is kind of cool. Just a print, but still very fun, and I think my first work sold to someone I don’t know. I’ve never even been to Minneapolis! So yeah, that’s fun.

Alongside this I got into the Saltaire Arts Trail with the water in videogames piece that I made last year called Everything Bad is Good for You. This will be available via a QR code which you scan with your phone whilst on the trail. I like the idea, and would actually love to go and see this thing, although it is fairly far up North. I did get £50, which was an unexpected monetary thing.

Last week I undertook a week long online residency with I.O.U.A.E, an arts organisation being run by Stacey Davidson, who’s been featured on isthisit? and was in the AFK show last year. As it’s been an incredibly busy week last week, putting off writing the uni essay alongside being interviewed over WhatsApp, I had completely forgotten about the res, and was unable to spend as much time as I’d have liked on the project. I did, however, manage to create an interesting body of work, coming back to an old project of mine called All My Messages, a website where I published all of my past Facebook messages. I then kind of dredged this document for data, creating digital images with the content, highlighting which words would supposedly get you followed by the NSA among other things. This manifested as digital images, videos, prints and a few sculptures. It was fun, and if you’re interested in seeing some of the work I produced go to their Instagram here - www.instagram.com/i.o.u.a.e/, hopefully soon I’ll have all the completed works on my website soon, and will talk about what all the work was specifically about in a later post, as this one is looking incredibly long already.

Since being back in Suffolk I’ve been going on a lot of walks, about once a day, taking an hour or so to walk around, reflect, etc. It’s been nice, although whenever I’m back in Suffolk old memories of the space re-surface, ones that I don’t particularly want to resurface, leading to reflection among other things. Right now I’m on a train on the way back to London, back to things happening all the time, a welcome change/distraction.

In the past week, as I mentioned, I wrote my essay for uni, all 3000 words of it. I decided to write about trolls and trolling online and why they’re coming out of the screen and into the AFK space, with reference to Donald Trump, the project He Will Not Divide Us and the trolling that occurred with that art piece, alongside LD50 gallery and just looking at the rise of trolls in general, talking about Anonymous and 4chan, etc. Here it is:

Contemporary trolls and where to find them

"Trolling is a art" (Anonymous, 2010) is perhaps the definitive statement to sum up the act of trolling. Trolling is, at the basest level, defined as the intentional disruption of another's emotional well-being, often through a feigned promotion of an unpopular belief, or political position, usually on the internet. In this example, the deliberate use of "a" where "an" should be is likely to arouse a negative reaction among those concerned with correct English usage. The fact that the statement is itself directly referring to trolling and the art thereof gives further power to its effect; if you're effected by this statement, its author has succeeded, and its veracity has been confirmed.
This contemporary definition of trolling has been used effectively in this way within the online sphere for decades, promoting hate and causing widespread frustration for many, only recently moving into the offline realm when Donald Trump was elected to be the 45th president of the United States of America, purportedly ‘the world’s greatest troll’ (Silver, 2015).
Within this essay I am going to examine the origin of the internet troll, how and why its transitioned into the AFK[1] environment, away from the ’murky depths’ of internet forums such as 4chan and Reddit, and its use as a political and social tool for change, regarding the rise of Donald Trump, the fall of LD50 gallery and the artwork ‘He Will Not Divide Us’, which has become an increasingly interesting collaborative art project between the artists involved and the internet.

From LOL to LULZ

The use of the word ‘troll’ as internet slang is said to have first appeared in Usenet[2] in the early 1990s with the phrase ‘trolling for newbies’ whereby a veteran user would introduce a question or topic that had been so overdone that only a new user would respond to them earnestly. This was seen as a positive contribution, used to identify new users of the platform, a far cry from today’s attributions of the term. As the 90s continued, and the internet became more widely used, trolling began to be seen in a negative light due to the rise in internet traffic, resulting in the sort of general confusion that occurs when a ‘cacophony of voices are all speaking simultaneously’ (Stoll, 1995). In 2003 the hacktivist group Anonymous was created on the online imageboard 4chan[3], the cultural meme[4] machine of our time, and became synonymous with the trolling community after a series of publicity stunts and coordinated DDoS[5] attacks on various groups and individuals. Although the media dubs the majority of Anonymous’ online events as ‘attacks’, these are in-fact unlicensed protests that occur when a group of Anons[6] are unhappy with an aspect of society (Coleman, 2014). The first major protest occurred on July 6, 2006 after moderators on the online social networking site Habbo Hotel were rumoured to be racially profiling against dark-skinned avatars, abusing their powers and banning users from the site. The protest involved swarms of Anons logging into the site with their avatars dressed in afros and business suits, forming a virtual blockade around the games pool, disallowing anyone from entering the environment (fig1). Although the event, forever dubbed ‘Pool’s Closed’, didn’t change Habbo’s problematic moderators (a rumour that was never officially confirmed by Habbo), it did bring widespread media attention to the group, leading to more impactful protests (labelled as ‘operations’) and a larger community of Anons contributing to massive social change in the years that followed Pool’s Closed.

Trolling for change

On June 16, 2015 Donald Trump announced his candidacy to be the next president of the United States with a campaign rally and speech at Trump Tower in New York City. In March of 2009 Trump had created a twitter account, which would serve as a unique campaign tool leading up to his election on November 8, 2016, utilising the application as a vehicle for connecting to his followers and the world, spreading ‘alternative facts’ and for some hate on a mass scale (Swaine, 2017). One could argue that one of the most atrocious examples of this was when Trump retweeted an image, which was said to have originated from a neo-Nazi Twitter account (fig2), containing wildly inaccurate crime data between black and white people (Trump, 2015). The use of Twitter in this way, spreading fake news and blurting out misogynistic comments, could be genius, simply because of the throwaway aspect of the social media feed, and the mass of content that’s continually being generated. If a reader sees a statistic that seems like it might be true, they may well assume it is, without considering the source, or even enlarging the image to see it clearly. This could be for several reasons; the perceived lack of time that’s afforded to people in the age of the internet (Goldsmith, 2016), or simply due to people taking a few minutes to like and re-tweet articles whilst sitting on the toilet, only skim-reading the titles to consume as much tertiary data as possible. Either way, many people won’t be looking back whilst surfing this information highway, and even if they did, what would be the point? Yesterday’s Trump tweet has already been forgotten, replaced by another, equally divisive addition to the pile of 3am tweeting misdemeanours that will be attributed to a lack of sleep (McGill, 2016), continuing to reinforce the alt-right movement and its ideals.

‘We memed him into the presidency’

Alongside the tweets, another tactic to keep Trump in the public eye, eventually bringing him to power, was to continually circulate memes across the internet. The meme is a form of visual media that, in the present day, is made for and by the internet. The term was originally coined by Richard Dawkins in his 1976 book The Selfish Gene as ‘"an idea, behaviour, or style that spreads from person to person within a culture" (Dawkins, 1989). Various groups of people saw it as their part time job to create memes focused on Trump, especially in the lead up to important debates and rally’s. After Hilary Clinton dubbed half of Trump’s supporters as a ‘basket of deplorables’ (Tatum, 2016) during a campaign speech, supporters adopted this name and continue to wear it as a badge of honour. ‘The Donald’, an incredibly active subreddit, has been described as a 24/7 Trump rally, and this is where most Deplorable’s create and share the memes that they have created. The content of the memes ranged from Trump as Pepe the Frog (fig3), originally a cartoon green frog that was popular in the late 2000s and is now appropriated as a symbol for the alt-right, to utilising emails leaked by WikiLeaks to circulate conspiracy theories like #pizzagate (All, 2016), a theory concerning child paedophilia that spiralled out of control, eventually resulting in somebody going into a pizza parlour with a gun. After the Access Hollywood tape was discovered, a recording of Trump discussing his incredibly misogynistic approach to women, the hashtag MAGA3X[7] began to circulate on Twitter. The idea, created by Mike Cernovich, was to do something Trump related at least three times a day, from bringing 3 other Trump voters with you on election day to retweeting 3 pro-Trump stories daily on your social media account. This surge in Trump related content overwhelmed social media and made the transition to AFK events like flash mobs and rallies (Johnson, 2016). At the DeploraBall, an unofficial inaugural ball to celebrate the victory and inauguration of Trump, participants exclaimed ‘we memed him into the presidency’ (This American Life, 2017), which seems fitting due to the huge amount of young naïve support that was thrown towards him by users of 4chan and Reddit (Beran, 2017).

HeWillNotDivide.Us

On the date of the presidential inauguration on 20 January 2017, the collaborative artist trio made up of Luke Turner, Nastja Rönkkö and Shia LeBeouf, began an art project that was said to be ‘open to all, 24 hours a day, seven days a week’ and ‘continuing for four years, or the duration of the presidency’ (He Will Not Divide Us, 2017). The piece was a video being live streamed from a camera mounted on a wall outside of the Museum of the Moving Image in New York City. Participants were invited to deliver the words "HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US" into the camera, repeating the phrase as many times, and for as long as they wish. In the days that followed the inauguration, people would log on to hewillnotdivide.us, usually being greeted by the sight of a group of smiling individuals of all ages and ethnicities, repeating the phrase in a (usually) calm and considered manner (fig4). The artwork became incredibly popular, garnering mainstream media attention due to Turner and Rönkkö capitalising on LeBeouf’s fame once again[8], alongside the piece’s relevance to Trump, protest culture and the possibility of becoming internet famous by ‘performing’ in front of the camera. The liberal nature of the project drew out the trolls of 4chan and members of the alt-right, enticing them to crawl from their nests within their computer screens and disrupt the peaceful, cult-like, nature of the installation. These disruptions varied from holding up photos of Pepe to more elaborate occurrences, a prime example being two individuals wearing skull masks cutting open a toy rabbit with a large steak knife in front of the camera. The first major incident occurred when a man, pretending to take a selfie with LaBeouf (who frequented the live stream to show solidarity to the participants) said ‘Hitler did nothing wrong’[9], causing LeBeouf to shove him away. Later in the day LeBeouf was arrested at the scene and charged with misdemeanour assault. After this event, crude pranks kept occurring, eventually resulting in the live stream being taken down, with the museum stating that it was creating ‘an ongoing public safety hazard’. This occurred on the 10 February, less than a month after the installation began. The trio challenged the museum for its ‘lack of commitment to the project’ and the stream was quickly relocated to a wall in Albuquerque outside the El Rey Theatre. Within five days it was stated that ‘shots were reported in the area’ (LaBeouf, 2017) and the live stream was shut down yet again.

Capture the flag

The project had become too successful in creating a dialogue between the left and the right, drifting away from its original intention of unity to that of violence, hate and kek[10]. Even though arguably everything that had happened at the different locations, alongside the dialogues occurring online, had been an incredibly thought-provoking reaction to the piece, it was obvious that the project was too triggering to replicate yet again in a different location. On the 8 March it was announced that the installation had transformed into a live stream in an unknown location, with the camera pointing up to the sky showing a flag emblazoned with the now well-known statement ‘HE WILL NOT DIVIDE US’. The trolls obviously saw this as a challenge, and within a day the flag’s location had been discovered by a group of 4chan users after analysing flight contrails and celestial navigation, with one user driving around honking the horn of his car so that it could be heard on the video stream, allowing others to triangulate where the flag was based on the driver’s location. The flag was taken down and replaced by a Make America Great Again t-shirt and hat. Fields were set alight and the stream was offline once again (fig5). At this point the group protesting the protest, (who had admittedly only been undertaking this exercise for ‘the lulz’ (Rusch, 2017) alongside having an issue with PC culture[11]) effectively attempting to silence the voice of the left, had become as much a part of the piece as the flag itself, throwing away their online anonymity with no fear for the repercussions. After this the trio stated that ‘America is simply not safe enough for this artwork to exist’ (FACT, 2017), so it was decided that it’s new home would be on top of the Foundation for Art and Creative Technology (FACT) in Liverpool, supposedly safe from the American political system that inspired the piece. Unsurprisingly, on the 23 March, within a day of the stream going live once again, the five-storey building was climbed and a masked individual appeared on the live stream, attempting to remove the flag. In the next hour FACT tweeted that on police advice the artists and the institution had removed the installation due to ‘dangerous, illegal trespassing’. As of writing, the art piece has yet to be reconfigured, although it’s safe to assume that when it does eventually appear the 4chan community will be called to action yet again. Are these ‘internet pranksters’ alt-right activists or simply bored people delighting in messing with a celebrity who’s known for his high-octane outbursts? Either way the artwork has, and will continue to, unite the troll community. What if this type of community could be utilised against something that’s supposedly inherently bad?

IS IT OK TO PUNCH A NAZI (ART GALLERY)?

This was the title of an article published by Mute magazine on the 16 February 2017 concerning a small art gallery in Dalston called LD50 who had, 6 months previously, organised an exhibition called ‘71822666’, named after a thread on 4chan that predicted Trump's victory. The exhibition explored visual strategies adopted by the so-called ‘alt-right’, as well as a related symposium with authors such as Peter Brimelow, Nick Land and Brett Stevens. The article accused the gallery of giving a platform to fascists, as well as actively promoting the alt-right. This led to a campaign for the gallery to close which was originally created on Facebook. Called Shut Down LD50, the group organised a demonstration outside the gallery on 25 February (fig 6), and the gallery subsequently has had to close for an unknowable amount of time due to vandalism and violent threats. When interviewed during the demonstration, many of the protestors admitted to having never even been inside the gallery, remarking that ‘art is shit’ (Gelder, 2017). Surely, even if the gallery was giving a platform to neo-Nazis, to simply jump on the bandwagon makes you as ill-informed as the 4chan trolls making fun of Labeouf and therefore not understanding that they had themselves become a part of the artwork that they were so intent on removing. Members of the SDLD50 group were also prone to confronting people online who had ‘liked’ LD50’s Instagram posts, and in some cases ‘no platforming’ them ahead of AFK talks and discussions (Larios, 2017). The Instagram, like any other art gallery in the age of the internet, had photographs of previous shows, including the meme filled exhibition ‘71822666’. A question one might ask is when did a virtual ‘like’ count as an endorsement of an alt-right ideology? Especially when associated with the throwaway aspect of social media, where you may ‘like’ upwards of 100 posts a day.

Where do we go from here?

Since Donald Trump was inaugurated, rising to a position of power and influence, we’ve seen an outbreak of trolls and peoples supposed true selves, originally imprisoned within the confines of their own home or on anonymous online message boards. Having a troll as the president of the United States sets a precedent, with many assuming that it’s now acceptable to be outwardly racist and misogynistic, cuck calling and proclaiming that ‘Hitler did nothing wrong’. Turner, Rönkkö and LeBeouf’s most recent project #ALONETOGETHER, where the artists are confined to wood cabins in unknown locations within Lapland with the only source of communication to the outside world being a live stream from within Kiasma museum, has already attracted the attention of anons, with various videos on YouTube showing individuals entering the exhibition and harassing LaBeouf. 4chan is already attempting to find the cabins (fig 7). How does the art community combat these obscure pockets of the online community entering the ‘sacred’ space of an art gallery, simply to mock a celebrity? How can we, dubbed ‘normies’ by the 4chan community, hope to understand the trolls and the alt-right without taking the same red pill[12] that they’ve been taking? Daniel Keller says you should ‘inoculate yourself against it while fighting back’ (Keller, 2017), although many trolls are outwardly normal people living normal lives who aren’t abusive AFK, the most prominent example being in a recent South Park episode where Gerald Broflovski spends his days as a hard working lawyer and his evenings photoshopping social media photographs and harassing others on message boards, stating that ‘it’s fun to stir the pot and watch everyone freak out’ (Parker, 2016). Should the liberal left allow themselves to be made fun of, to go with the jokes, similar to an American opossum pretending to be dead to reduce the possibility of being eaten, or should we adopt Trump’s philosophy of rolling with the memes and bonding with the younger generation that enjoy anarchy and conspiracy theories? Either way, staying in your own liberal filter bubble, no platforming speakers at universities and protesting because of ill-informed facts, is no longer an option now that the king troll is at the head of the table, we all need to become investigative reporters, fact checking as we go.

Fig 1
Fig 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig 5
Fig 6
Fig 7
Bibliography
All, R. (2016, December 8). Voyage Into Pizzagate. Retrieved from Gimlet Media: https://gimletmedia.com/episode/83-voyage-into-pizzagate/
Anonymous. (2010, - -). trolling is a art. Retrieved from Know Your Meme: http://knowyourmeme.com/forums/meme-research/topics/2994-trolling-is-a-art
Anonymous. (2017, April 8). Things That Anarchists Say to Me in Private But Never Repeat Publicly. Retrieved from Infoshop News: http://news.infoshop.org/opinion/things-anarchists-say
Beran, D. (2017, February 14). 4chan: The Skeleton Key to the Rise of Trump. Retrieved from Medium: https://medium.com/@DaleBeran/4chan-the-skeleton-key-to-the-rise-of-trump-624e7cb798cb
Coleman, G. (2014). Hacker, Hoaxer, Whistleblower, Spy: The Many Faces of Anonymous. New York City: Verso Books.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks.
Doctorow, C. (2014). Information Doesn't Want to Be Free. San Fransisco: McSweeney's.
FACT. (2017, March 25). HEWILLNOTDIVIDE.US. Retrieved from FACT: http://www.fact.co.uk/news-articles/2017/03/hewillnotdivideus.aspx
Gelder, S. (2017, February 27). LD50 gallery: Anti-fascist protesters march through Dalston. Retrieved from Hackney Gazette: http://www.hackneygazette.co.uk/news/politics/ld50-gallery-anti-fascist-protesters-march-through-dalston-1-4907083
Goldsmith, K. (2016). Wasting Time on the Internet. New York: Harper Perennial.
Harris, L. (2017, March 27). LaBeouf, Rönkkö & Turner’s Trump protest: putting art at centre of struggle despite Liverpool closure. Retrieved from a-n: https://www.a-n.co.uk/news/shia-labeoufs-trump-protest-putting-art-at-centre-of-struggle-despite-liverpool-closure
He Will Not Divide Us. (2017, March 25). Retrieved from He Will Not Divide Us: http://www.hewillnotdivide.us/
Johnson, C. C. (2016, October 18). MAGA! High Energy @MAGA3X Campaign To Vote #TrumpPence16 Taking Over The Airwaves #MAGA3X. Retrieved from Got News: http://gotnews.com/maga-high-energy-maga3x-campaign-vote-trumppence16-taking-airwaves-maga3x/
Johnson, S. A. (1999). Interface Culture: How New Technology Transforms the Way We Create and Communicate. New York: Basic Books.
Kahlich, S. (2017, February 12). Art 31 - Sticks & Stones. Retrieved from Soundcloud: https://soundcloud.com/artipoeus/art-31-stick-stones
Keller, D. (2017, April 6). The Basilisk – A lecture by Daniel Keller at Spike Berlin. Retrieved from YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=721XhxAHoUI
LaBeouf, S. (2017, February 23). thecampaignbook. Retrieved from Twitter: https://twitter.com/thecampaignbook/status/834719475832385536?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fdeadline.com%2F2017%2F02%2Fshia-labeouf-he-will-not-divide-us-anti-trump-project-relocated-1201916048%2F
Larios, P. (2017, March 16). Survey: Culture Wars. Frieze.
McGill, A. (2016, October 7). What Trump Tweets While America Sleeps. Retrieved from The Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/10/what-trump-tweets-while-america-sleeps/503141/
mona_jpn. (2017, March 23). Pools Closed. Retrieved from Know Your Meme: http://knowyourmeme.com/memes/pools-closed
Olson, P. (2013). We Are Anonymous: Inside the Hacker World of LulzSec, Anonymous, and the Global Cyber Insurgency.
Parker, T. (Director). (2016). South Park - Skank Hunt - Season 20 Episode 2 [Motion Picture].
Phillips, W. (2015). This is Why We Can't Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Rusch, A. (2017, April 12). Shia LaBeouf’s Anti-Trump ‘Art Project’ Becomes Global Game Of Capture The Flag. Retrieved from The Federalist: https://thefederalist.com/2017/04/12/shia-labeoufs-anti-trump-art-project-becomes-global-game-capture-flag/
Silver, N. (2015, July 20). Donald Trump Is The World’s Greatest Troll. Retrieved from fivethirtyeight: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/donald-trump-is-the-worlds-greatest-troll/
Stoll, C. (1995, February 26). Why The Web Won't Be Nirvana. Retrieved from Newsweek: http://www.newsweek.com/clifford-stoll-why-web-wont-be-nirvana-185306
Swaine, J. (2017, January 23). Donald Trump's team defends 'alternative facts' after widespread protests. Retrieved from The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/jan/22/donald-trump-kellyanne-conway-inauguration-alternative-facts
Tatum, D. M. (2016, September 12). Clinton expresses regret for saying 'half' of Trump supporters are 'deplorables'. Retrieved from CNN: http://edition.cnn.com/2016/09/09/politics/hillary-clinton-donald-trump-basket-of-deplorables/
The Truth About Pepe The Frog and The Cult of Kek. (2017, April 9). Retrieved from Pepe The Frog Faith: https://pepethefrogfaith.wordpress.com/
This American Life. (2017, January 20). The Revolution Starts At Noon.
Trump, D. (2015, November 22). @realDonaldTrump. Retrieved from Twitter: https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/668520614697820160
Untermesh, O. (2017, February 2017). IS IT OK TO PUNCH A NAZI (ART GALLERY)? Retrieved from MetaMute: http://www.metamute.org/editorial/articles/it-ok-to-punch-nazi-art-gallery

So that was the essay, kind of fun, with the next piece of writing for uni being dissertation prep later on in the term. How fucking exciting…

What next? Before coming home for the holidays, about 4 weeks ago, I went to a bunch of galleries. So I’ll run through these incredibly quickly now, as they’re probably out of date by now.

First off, Annka Kultys with a solo show by Stine Deja. It was an interesting show, evoking a departures lounge at an airport, with the classic metal bench seating, grilled ash cylindrical ash tray and departures board. The installation was fun, although the whole show revolved around one video piece, which was being shown on both a projector and 3 iPads. It’s a good video, but at least 2 years old which I’d already watched on her Vimeo. Although this is similar to a lot of other video art installations, in this case when 4 devices are being utilised for the same video, it’s a bit annoying. I understand the repetitive nature of the departure lounge, the mundanity of the experience, but still… The video is good, considering digital environments and embodying/living within them? I think, as I said, it’s been 4 weeks of walking around in the country. So yeah, good show if you’re new to the work.
Ah shit, there were also a bunch of student led shows in that last week, most of which I have forgotten. The most interesting aspect of all these shows was (If I can remember) was the various venues that people had hired/discovered, from a theatre on top of a pub to a beauty parlour where I had to squeeze past people to look at mediocre work. Hmmm…

Seventeen Gallery surprised me with a solo show of paintings by Rhys Coren. These are made up of spray painted/acrylic wooden boards which are obviously cut up, then fit back together within a wooden frame. They’re very nice to look at, and impressive too. The actual content is mostly wiggles and bright aesthetic wiggles. Not really sure what they were trying to say, as the press release was a poem, not unlike the majority of Seventeen’s exhibitions.
Another painting show that I enjoyed, Gordon Cheung at Edel Assanti with a solo show called Unknown Knowns. A title I’ve used for a previous work, how funny. So this was made up of these incredible paintings, one of which was a triptych of this futuristic environment, mountains, etc. The paint is this incredibly thick oil paint which is built up over multiple layers. These were accompanied by literally glitched images printed onto canvas. I’m not a big fan of glitch art…
TJ Boulting had an exhibition featuring Daniel Castro Garcia with a bunch of work about migration, travelling to various countries around Europe and finally visiting ‘The Jungle’ in Calais. Lots of photographs, a few videos, one that was being projected onto this silk garment which was a bit weird, but apart from that it was pretty solid work. One of the videos in particular featured the artist wandering around snowy mountain tops, which can’t really be faulted. 
Part 4 of Carroll Fletcher’s exhibition in four parts had some great work, from Eva and Franco Mattes Stolen Pieces where the artists stole parts of famous art works over the course of a few years, alongside a video game evoking space invaders by Thomson and Craighead where instead of aliens you destroy Michael Foucault’s essay What is an Author? I made the mistake of spending 10 minutes completing the whole thing, with no real payoff at the end. Joshua Citarella and Brad Troemel’s Etsy store pieces were there too, which are basically ideas of things that can be bought and are then fabricated by the buyer. In this case it was a Ethernet cable washing line, a bunch of Amazon boxes and a be all protest sign (very funny) which was basically a white board attached to a stick.
White Rainbow had a ‘nice’ group show on, with the main appeal being a computer-generated video of all these incredibly bright white spaces by Alexandra Navratil. Holly Hendry’s work was also there, and by now it’s a given that it is nice, but I want to see something new from her now…
White Cube, I’m beginning to hate all their shows. Big and brash and boring! I hate Josiah McElheny’s work, it’s artwork to please the masses, reflective glass pieces that are nice to look at. My most favourite moment from the experience was when a small child climbed underneath one of the large, all glass works, and I witnessed the invigilators being incredibly sweet to the child as they attempted to coax him from underneath the structure. That’s it.
Fold had a show on by Valerie Kolakis, lots of MDF board and everyday objects placed at ‘interesting’ angles alongside bronze bags that are painted to seem like they’re not bronze, etc. It was okay but forgettable.

Maureen Paley was dull and unforgettable.

Pilar Corrias had 2 interesting shows with the main event featuring Alice Theobald. An interesting false grass walkway leads you through the space, down the stairs and into another room of the space. Sand bags are piled high as you walk in, with a reversed video of a dog, taken from a phone, being shown on a tv screen. The most interesting part was a mobility chair which assisted you on the stairs. You were invited to sit on the chair and glide down the stairs listening to a video piece where a (presumably) old woman is repeating the words ‘He never imagined he’d be so moved’. Didn’t really understand but was fun. 3D video downstairs, unneeded.

Also in the gallery was a bunch of paintings/photographs by Louisa Gagliardi. These are usually figures of beauty, originally printed onto PVC canvas and then worked on with layers of gel to give them a really interesting ‘look’ which I really liked. Big fan.
Whilst in Suffolk I visited an exhibition in Norwich at OUTPOST's residency space. The work produced, by Magnus Ayers was a culmination of a one month residency within the space. It featured carboard cut outs of his avatar it seems, which were being propped up by an AFK version of this robotic claw which was also a very short video piece. There was also a large projection showing a video looking at Renault and its innovative approach to car design in this fast approaching post-human space. Kind of fun, was it worth driving an hour to Norwich for? Maybe, but maybe not…

So I’ve been dreading typing up all the films and tv I’ve watched, as this blog post is already about 8000 words including the essay. I’m just going to go for it, probably listing most of them, and talking about only a few which catch my eye as exceptional.

xXx: Return of Xander Cage was terrible, How I Live Now was okay, You Will Meet a Tall Dark Stranger was fun, The Ideas of March was fun, both Chef and Burnt were put on my watch list because of an amazing YouTube channel called Binging with Babish where the guy makes food in films incredibly well. Both okay films.

A United Kingdom was beautiful, Elle was simply astonishingly amazing, What Women Want was kind of fun, The Love Witch was very funny, The Space Between Us was pretty wanky, Split was okay, Weiner-Dog was fairly unnerving, Prevenge was mental in a great way, A Walk in the Woods was lovingly contemplative.
Office Christmas Party was terrible and I’m ashamed to have watched it. Short Circuit was fun, but incredibly misogynistic at times. My Father and My Son was deeply depressing. The Discovery was really well done, Cannibal Holocaust was incredibly visceral for all the wrong reasons.

Cannibal Women in the Avocado Jungle of Death was amazingly hilarious. Mine was basic, Storytelling was weirdly thought provoking. Upside Down was basic but Catfight was hilarious and well worth a watch. Kong: Skull Island was fine. Krisha was worryingly depressing, Christine was just depressing and Movie 43 was obviously terrible.

Win It All was nice, as was Drinking Buddies. Detachment was depressingly weird.

I think that’s it? There was probably more that I’ve forgotten, which I hate to do, but I guess that’s my fault for not updating this fucking thing for over a month!

I also watched a bunch of tv shows. Lovesick which was beautiful and worth a watch, Odd Mom Out which was terrible, Mike Tyson Mysteries is hilarious, as was Animals, One Day at a Time (the 2017 version) was bad.
Dramaworld was a weird indie show, Better Things is amazing and even more so if you’re a mother (probably), Baskets was sad, Insecure was very ‘real’ and Undeclared was incredibly funny and worth your time.
I also played an incredible video game called Night in the Woods. The gameplay is very basic; a 2D platformer/visual novel, clicking through for dialogue, but what’s being spoken about, the story, the characters, all of these are amazingly impressive aspects of this game. I would describe it as crushing. Highly recommended.

This is where I’m going to stop writing, because at over 8000 words I feel like I’ve just dumped a load of text, but I do feel like I’ve caught (almost) everything up in a very vague way… Now I’m back in London, ready to make some new work, put on the show at Serf and plan issue 2 of the magazine!

No comments:

Post a Comment